Washburn D10S Reviews2 Found On 2007-12-20, Uncle SEARS gave this Washburn Acoustic Guitar a 4...(12832)
History: Only been playing for 18 months. Mainly fairly simple stuff from TAB books purchased in music stores. No band....certainly not yet !! Very much admire Beatles, Stones, Clapton...Cream, Creedence, etc....that era. Clapton is safe...doesn't have to worry about me for a while.
Purchase: Walked into local music store and paid cash..AUD $300. Took the advice of the salesman who was very good and in no doubt that I had never picked a guitar up before. The deal included bag, tutorial CD and tuner...a great deal!! Believe these now cost abt AUD $350.00 in 2007.
Pros: Seems to be very well constructed for this price range. It has good volume and when set up correctly offers very good "playability."
Cons: Not much. It required another set up abt 8 months after I bought it....the neck required adjustment and the action needed fixing but this was easily acieved by a technician at reasonable cost.
Quality: This was made in China (what isn't?) but that certainly doesn't detract from it at all. No glue spots and the overall finish is very good. Tuners appear to be good quality as well. Stays in tune very well if housed in a case. Solid and well presented. Summary: For this sort of money an excellent entry level guitar... although I have seen a guitarist play one in a band at a local hotel so that must also say somethng about it. If it died or left home tomorrow I would buy another.
Good value for money, there would be a lot worse out there.
Search for more Washburn Acoustic Guitar reviews and comparisons On 2003-01-10, elliott gave this Washburn Acoustic Guitar a 4...(3894)
Purchase: Bought it at a local music chain store, paid $300 with a hard case. Including tax license, dealer prep, a new set of strings, and the optional white sidewalls.
Pros: I have small hands, so I love the thin neck and low action. The sound is nice and even, although a little "thin" on the bottom end.
Cons: I don't care especially for some of the fit and finish. The inlay pattern on the back isn't even at all, and the grain of the wood on the top is not as tight as I'd like, but hey, it was a cheap guitar!
Quality: I had to have new strings put on and have the neck adjusted to eliminate a really bad buzz on the second fret eliminated before I bought it. Other than that, it's played well. Stays in tune pretty well, too. Summary: I was looking for a beginner guitar that would sound nice, look okay, and not break the bank. I narrowed my choice down to the Washburn or an equivalent Dean, and decided on the Washburn ONLY because the Dean didn't have a pick guard. But I've been satisfied overall.
Search for more Washburn Acoustic Guitar reviews and comparisons
© Chris Bereznay - Gear Review Network / MusicGearReview.com - 2000
|
|
